IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Is Carbon Trading an Effective Strategy Reducing Emissions?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1714029544

Title: Is Carbon Trading an Effective Strategy for Reducing Emissions?

Question: Some people believe that carbon trading is a successful approach to reducing emissions, while others argue that it does not work effectively. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.

Model Answer:

Carbon trading has emerged as a potential strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in recent years. This approach involves setting a cap on total emissions and allowing companies to buy and sell allowances, thereby incentivizing firms to reduce their emissions. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument surrounding carbon trading and provide an overview of its effectiveness.

In favor of carbon trading, proponents argue that this market-based mechanism encourages innovation in clean energy technologies. By placing a financial value on carbon dioxide emissions, companies are incentivized to invest in more environmentally friendly practices. This can lead to the development of new technologies and the implementation of sustainable solutions, ultimately reducing overall emissions. Furthermore, carbon trading allows for flexibility in emission reductions, as companies can choose how best to reduce their emissions within the allowed cap.

On the other hand, opponents of carbon trading argue that it does not effectively reduce emissions in practice. Critics claim that this system can lead to "hot air" - a situation where companies sell allowances they already have or are unlikely to use, which does not result in actual emission reductions. Additionally, some argue that carbon trading is vulnerable to manipulation by powerful corporations, who may be able to influence the market and maximize their profits. As a result, these companies may not significantly reduce their emissions, negating the intended purpose of the system.

In conclusion, while carbon trading has the potential to effectively reduce emissions, its practical implementation leaves much room for improvement. While it may incentivize innovation in clean energy technologies, the risk of "hot air" and corporate manipulation undermines the effectiveness of this approach. Ultimately, a combination of policies, including stricter regulations and renewable energy investment, is essential to achieving meaningful emission reductions.

Score: Band 7.5 - The response demonstrates a good understanding of both sides of the argument but lacks a clear conclusion. The essay structure is mostly sound, with some minor grammatical errors that do not significantly impact comprehension.

Source: https://ielts.work/?id=1714029544&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice