IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should Governments Invest More in Space Exploration?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713266975

Title: Should Governments Invest More in Space Exploration?

Question: In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether governments should invest more in space exploration. Some argue that it is essential for scientific progress, while others claim that resources would be better spent on addressing pressing terrestrial issues. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.

Model Answer:

Space exploration has been a subject of significant interest to humanity since the early 20th century. Governments around the world have made substantial investments in space programs, aiming to advance scientific knowledge, enhance national prestige, and potentially identify resources that can be utilized for human benefit. However, critics argue that these funds could be better allocated to resolve pressing terrestrial issues such as poverty, education, and healthcare. This essay will examine both perspectives and conclude with a personal viewpoint on the matter.

In favor of increased investment in space exploration, proponents argue that it has the potential to bring about groundbreaking scientific discoveries. For example, the study of celestial bodies can provide insights into the origins and evolution of our universe. Additionally, understanding the conditions necessary for life beyond Earth may contribute to the development of new technologies and the discovery of resources such as water or minerals. The Apollo missions, in particular, have been hailed as a turning point in modern science and engineering, demonstrating the transformative power of space exploration.

Furthermore, investment in space exploration can boost national prestige by showcasing a nation's technological prowess and commitment to scientific advancement. For instance, the successful launching of the Hubble Space Telescope by NASA solidified America’s position as a world leader in space technology during the Cold War era. The same can be said about the European Space Agency (ESA) and its contributions to global scientific research through initiatives like Rosetta's mission to comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

However, critics argue that funding should be redirected to address critical issues on Earth before venturing into space. The argument holds merit, as millions of people worldwide face hunger, disease, and inadequate access to education. Allocating funds toward alleviating these problems would have a more immediate and tangible impact on the lives of individuals than investing in space exploration.

Moreover, some argue that even if space exploration yielded significant benefits, they might not outweigh the costs involved. For instance, developing and launching a mission to Mars requires substantial resources, including highly skilled personnel and cutting-edge technology. Critics assert that these resources could be better allocated to improving living standards on Earth.

In conclusion, while space exploration has undoubtedly contributed to scientific advancements and national prestige, it is essential to consider the potential benefits against the costs incurred. Governments should strike a balance between investing in space exploration and addressing pressing terrestrial issues. Ultimately, the decision lies in determining where resources can be most effectively utilized for the betterment of humanity as a whole.

Task 2 Writing: Band Score - 8

The given model answer is well-structured and coherent, with a clear introduction, development of ideas, and conclusion. The author presents both sides of the argument effectively, providing evidence to support each perspective. Additionally, the essay demonstrates a high level of grammar and vocabulary usage, reflecting an advanced level of English proficiency.

Source: https://ielts.work/?id=1713266975&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice