IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should schools have a longer school day or year?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713172642
Topic: Should schools have a longer school day or year?
Model Answer:
It is an ongoing debate whether schools should extend their hours of operation or the length of the academic year in order to enhance students' educational outcomes. There are valid arguments in favor of both options, and each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages.
One potential benefit of extending the school day is that it would allow for more comprehensive coverage of the curriculum. With additional hours dedicated to learning, teachers could delve deeper into subjects, explore complex topics in greater detail, and provide students with a more thorough understanding of each subject matter. This, in turn, would contribute to improved academic achievement and better preparation for higher education or the workforce.
On the other hand, an extended school day may have unintended consequences on students' well-being. Longer hours spent at school could lead to increased stress levels, as students may feel overwhelmed by the demands of their studies and extracurricular activities. This can ultimately result in burnout, negatively affecting both their physical and mental health.
Alternatively, lengthening the academic year could be a more effective approach to maximize learning opportunities. By adding more weeks or months to the school calendar, educators would have ample time to thoroughly cover all subjects, while still providing students with adequate breaks to rest and recharge. However, this option may not be feasible in regions with severe weather conditions, such as heavy snowfall or extreme heat, which could disrupt school operations.
In conclusion, both options - a longer school day and a longer academic year - have their merits and drawbacks. The choice ultimately depends on the specific context and needs of each educational institution. It is crucial for schools to carefully consider the potential impact of these changes on students' well-being, as well as the practicality of implementing such measures, before deciding on the best course of action.
Task Response:
8.5/
9 - The response thoroughly covers all aspects of the topic and presents a balanced argument with appropriate supporting points and explanations. There are no significant errors in grammar or coherence.
Coherence and Cohesion:
8.5/
9 - The paragraph flows smoothly from one point to another, with logical transitions between ideas. The writer effectively uses cohesive devices such as pronouns, conjunctions, and repetition to maintain coherence throughout the response.
Lexical Resource:
8.0/
9 - The writer demonstrates a wide range of vocabulary and accurate usage of complex words, with only a few minor errors in word choice or grammar.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
8.5/
9 - The response is largely free from significant grammatical errors. There are a few minor errors in tense consistency or subject-verb agreement, but they do not interfere with the overall understanding of the text.
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1713172642&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
