IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments prioritize the needs of the individual or the collective?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713150333
IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: "Should governments prioritize the needs of the individual or the collective?"
Model Answer:
In recent times, the debate regarding whether governments should prioritize the needs of the individual or the collective has gained significant traction. Governments are often faced with the challenging task of balancing the needs and rights of each individual citizen against those of the entire society. This essay will analyze both perspectives, considering the potential benefits and drawbacks of each approach, and ultimately argue that governments should prioritize the collective interests of society in order to promote long-term stability, social cohesion, and overall well-being for all citizens.
On one hand, prioritizing the needs of the individual may seem like a more compassionate and democratic approach, as it seeks to ensure that each person's rights and freedoms are respected. For instance, by giving individuals the freedom to pursue their own personal ambitions and aspirations, governments can foster creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship - qualities essential for economic growth and progress. Furthermore, this approach recognizes the inherent dignity of each individual, which is a cornerstone of modern liberal democracies.
On the other hand, prioritizing the collective requires governments to make decisions that may not always align with an individual's personal interests or desires. However, this perspective argues that in order to maintain social cohesion and ensure long-term stability, governments must sometimes prioritize the greater good over the rights of a single individual. For example, policies such as conscription during wartime, the implementation of strict lockdown measures during public health crises, or the regulation of harmful substances to protect citizens' health can all be seen as sacrifices made in the name of collective well-being.
In conclusion, while it is essential for governments to respect and uphold the rights and freedoms of each individual citizen, it is ultimately more important to prioritize the collective interests of society. By doing so, governments can ensure long-term stability, social cohesion, and overall well-being for all citizens. Although this approach may occasionally necessitate compromising an individual's personal ambitions or desires, the benefits of a cohesive and harmonious society are worth the occasional sacrifice.
Overall
Score:
Band 9
Task Response:
9 (The candidate has provided a detailed response to all aspects of the task, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic.)
Coherence and Coherence:
9 (The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs that are logically organized, and a strong conclusion. The essay flows smoothly from one idea to another.)
Lexical Resource:
8 (The candidate uses a wide range of vocabulary, demonstrating an advanced level of English. There are a few instances where the vocabulary might be slightly simplistic, but it does not hinder understanding.)
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
9 (The essay is largely error-free, with only a few minor inaccuracies that do not impact comprehension.)
Presentation of Ideas:
9 (The candidate presents their ideas clearly and effectively, using appropriate examples to support their arguments. They also engage with both perspectives of the debate in a balanced manner, providing compelling reasons for their chosen position.)
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1713150333&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
