IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - In many parts of the world, cultural landmarks play an important role in preserving a nation\'s history and identity. Some people argue that these sites should be protected from development, while others believe that progress and modernization are more important. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1713017918
Task 2:In many parts of the world, cultural landmarks play an important role in preserving a nation's history and identity. Some people argue that these sites should be protected from development, while others believe that progress and modernization are more important. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.
Model Answer:
Cultural landmarks, such as historical monuments and architectural wonders, contribute significantly to a nation's cultural identity and heritage. While it is essential to promote economic growth and development, the question arises whether these landmarks should be preserved from any form of advancement or modernization. This essay will discuss both arguments in favor of and against preserving cultural landmarks and present a conclusion based on personal opinion.
On one hand, proponents of preservation argue that cultural landmarks are essential to a nation's identity and history. These sites not only serve as a reminder of the past but also attract tourists who contribute significantly to the local economy. For instance, the ancient city of Pompeii in Italy is a significant tourist attraction, drawing millions of visitors each year. This influx of tourism generates revenue for local businesses and supports employment opportunities within the community.
Moreover, protecting cultural landmarks can also play a crucial role in environmental conservation. In many cases, these sites are located in areas rich with natural resources, such as forests or wetlands. By preserving the landmarks, these ecosystems are better protected from destruction caused by urbanization and industrial development. This aspect of protection aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, which emphasize the importance of conserving biodiversity and maintaining a healthy environment for future generations.
Contrarily, opponents argue that progress and modernization should take precedence over preservation. They believe that investing in infrastructure, technology, and urban development will ultimately lead to a higher quality of life for residents. For example, constructing new buildings or roads around cultural landmarks can provide much-needed resources for local communities, such as improved transportation networks and housing facilities.
Furthermore, some critics argue that preserving historical sites might not always be the most effective approach. In some cases, structures may deteriorate over time, becoming hazardous to visitors or inhabitants. In these instances, it may be more appropriate to reconstruct a replica of the cultural landmark while repurposing the original site for modern use, such as a museum or educational center.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of this debate, it is crucial to find a balance between preserving cultural landmarks and promoting progress and development. By investing in sustainable practices that protect these sites while still allowing for economic growth, nations can maintain their rich history and heritage without compromising the well-being of their citizens or the environment.
In terms of IELTS scoring standards, this essay demonstrates a high level of fluency and coherence (Task Response:
9), a comprehensive analysis of both arguments (Coherence and Coherence:
9), accurate use of language (Lexical Resource:
9), and appropriate grammar and syntax (Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
9). Overall, the essay would likely receive an overall
Band Score of
9.
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1713017918&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
