IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Is geoengineering a viable solution to climate change?

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712932592

Task 2: Writing TopicIs geoengineering a viable solution to climate change?

To address this question, you are required to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of geoengineering as a potential solution to climate change and provide a well-supported opinion on its viability. Make sure to use appropriate vocabulary and grammar throughout your response, as these factors will contribute to your overall score in this writing test.

Model Answer

In recent years, the increasing threat of climate change has led to the exploration of various solutions, including geoengineering – the large-scale intervention in the Earth's natural systems to counteract climate change. This essay will examine whether geoengineering is a viable solution to address this global crisis by analyzing its potential benefits and drawbacks.

On the one hand, geoengineering offers several advantages as a means of mitigating climate change. One proposed method is solar radiation management (SRM), which aims to reflect a portion of the sun's energy back into space to cool the Earth. This approach could potentially reduce the impact of global warming and alleviate the worst effects of rising temperatures. Additionally, geoengineering could be implemented relatively quickly and may require less funding than other climate change mitigation strategies, such as renewable energy projects or carbon capture technologies.

However, there are also significant drawbacks to consider when evaluating the viability of geoengineering. Firstly, SRM might inadvertently cause unforeseen consequences, such as disrupting weather patterns and causing regional imbalances in temperature and precipitation. This could lead to more extreme weather events and exacerbate existing climate change problems rather than alleviating them.

Moreover, geoengineering is a potentially irreversible solution that could have long-lasting effects on the planet's ecosystems. As our understanding of Earth's complex systems is still incomplete, there is a risk of unintentionally causing more harm than good through geoengineering interventions. Additionally, this approach may divert attention and resources from more sustainable solutions, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions or investing in renewable energy infrastructure.

In conclusion, while geoengineering presents a potentially rapid and relatively low-cost solution to climate change, its potential drawbacks and the possibility of unintended consequences make it a high-risk strategy with uncertain long-term effects. As such, it is crucial to explore alternative, sustainable approaches to mitigating climate change, rather than relying solely on geoengineering as a panacea.

Scoring

Based on the IELTS scoring standards, the above model answer would receive:

- Task Response (4): The essay effectively addresses the question and presents a well-supported opinion.
- Coherence and Cohesion (5): The essay is logically structured with clear paragraphs and transitions between ideas.
- Lexical Resource (4.5): The vocabulary used in the response is generally appropriate, although there are some minor errors or repetitions.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (4.5): The grammar and syntax are mostly accurate, but there are a few minor errors that slightly affect clarity.

Source: https://ielts.work/?id=1712932592&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice