IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - _Is society becoming more or less engaged in political activism?_
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712511583
Task 2 Topic:_Is society becoming more or less engaged in political activism?_
Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been a growing trend of increased engagement in political activism across the globe. This surge can be attributed to various factors, including social media, globalization, and an overall dissatisfaction with existing political systems. While some argue that this heightened level of involvement is a positive development, others contend that it may lead to an oversimplification of complex issues, as well as an overreliance on slogans rather than substantive policy analysis. In order to assess whether society is becoming more or less engaged in political activism, it is essential to consider the various factors that have contributed to this shift and weigh the potential benefits against any potential drawbacks.
On one hand, the rise of social media has undoubtedly played a significant role in fueling political activism. Platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram have allowed individuals from diverse backgrounds to connect with like-minded people, share ideas, and coordinate actions more effectively than ever before. This increased connectivity has not only facilitated the spread of information but also enabled grassroots movements to mobilize quickly and efficiently in response to perceived injustices or political failures. In this way, social media has democratized activism, empowering individuals to take a stand on important issues without relying on traditional gatekeepers such as mainstream media or established political organizations.
Globalization has also played a part in fostering greater engagement in political activism. As countries become increasingly interconnected economically, culturally, and politically, people are exposed to a broader range of perspectives and ideas. This exposure can spark interest in advocating for change on both local and international levels. For example, the rise of global environmental movements such as the fight against climate change has galvanized individuals around the world to take action and push their governments to implement more sustainable policies.
However, it is important to acknowledge that this increased engagement in political activism may come with its own set of challenges. For one, the proliferation of information on social media can lead to an oversimplification of complex issues. Activists and average citizens alike often share soundbites or catchphrases rather than engaging in nuanced debate. This superficial approach to activism can result in a lack of understanding of the underlying causes and potential consequences of various policies, which ultimately may hinder the development of effective solutions.
Additionally, relying on social media as the primary platform for political activism may inadvertently contribute to echo chambers or filter bubbles. These online environments can create an illusion of consensus among like-minded individuals, which can reinforce preconceived notions and stereotypes, while also discouraging critical thinking and dialogue with those holding opposing views. Consequently, this lack of diverse perspectives may limit the potential for meaningful progress and compromise in political activism.
In conclusion, it is evident that society's engagement in political activism has witnessed a significant uptick in recent years. While social media and globalization have played pivotal roles in facilitating greater involvement, it is crucial to be mindful of the potential pitfalls associated with this heightened level of activism. By critically evaluating the benefits and drawbacks of increased political engagement, we can ensure that society's pursuit of change remains constructive and informed, ultimately contributing to a more equitable and just world.
Task 2
Scoring Criteria:
- Task Response (1-4): 4 - The response demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic, addressing all aspects of it. It shows a well-organized and coherent structure with appropriate examples or explanations to support the arguments presented. 3 - The response addresses most aspects of the topic but may have some gaps in understanding or organization. It includes relevant examples but may not be fully coherent. 2 - The response demonstrates a limited understanding of the topic, providing only partial information and/or irrelevant examples. The structure is poor, and the argument is difficult to follow. 1 - The response shows little or no understanding of the topic and does not address any aspects of it.
- Coherence and Cohesion (1-4): 4 - The essay is well-structured with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. It flows logically from one point to another, with smooth transitions between paragraphs. 3 - The essay has a generally logical structure but may have some inconsistencies or awkward transitions between paragraphs. 2 - The essay lacks a clear structure and transitions, making it difficult to follow the writer's ideas. 1 - The essay is incoherent and lacks any logical organization or transitions, making it impossible to understand the writer's intended message.
- Lexical Resource (1-4): 4 - The essay demonstrates a wide range of vocabulary, with few or no errors. It employs a variety of grammatical structures effectively, contributing to clear and precise expression. 3 - The essay has a moderate range of vocabulary, with some grammar or lexical inaccuracies. It generally communicates its message but may be somewhat unclear in places due to language errors. 2 - The essay's limited vocabulary and grammar errors significantly impair the clarity of expression. The meaning is often difficult to discern. 1 - The essay is virtually unintelligible due to extensive grammar and lexical errors, rendering it impossible to understand the writer's intended message.
- Precision (1-4): 4 - The essay accurately conveys complex ideas with clear and concise language. It avoids overly simplistic explanations or generalizations. 3 - The essay mostly presents complex ideas with appropriate clarity and conciseness but may have some instances of oversimplification or vagueness. 2 - The essay struggles to convey complex ideas precisely, with frequent oversimplifications or vague explanations. 1 - The essay is unable to articulate complex ideas clearly and concisely due to frequent inaccuracies, oversimplifications, and ambiguities.
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1712511583&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
