IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments invest in public transportation to reduce car emissions?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712408546
IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Should governments invest in public transportation to reduce car emissions?
Model Answer:
In recent years, the increasing concern about climate change has led to a growing interest in sustainable transport systems. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of investing in public transportation to reduce car emissions. While there are valid arguments against such investment, it is essential for governments to prioritize public transportation development to mitigate the adverse effects of carbon emissions on the environment.
One of the primary benefits of investing in public transportation is its potential to significantly reduce carbon emissions. Cars are one of the leading contributors to air pollution, and by encouraging people to use public transport, governments can reduce the number of vehicles on the road, thus lowering overall emissions. This would not only help to improve air quality but also contribute to a healthier lifestyle for citizens, who would benefit from reduced exposure to harmful pollutants.
Additionally, investing in public transportation can lead to more efficient use of resources and land. Expanding public transit systems can reduce the need for expansive road networks, freeing up valuable urban space for other purposes, such as parks or housing. This not only contributes to a better quality of life but also helps manage the growing demands of urban populations.
Moreover, public transportation can promote social integration and cohesion among diverse communities. By making transport accessible to all citizens, regardless of their socio-economic status, governments can foster a more inclusive society where people from different backgrounds interact and collaborate. This increased social interaction can help to break down barriers and promote mutual understanding and respect.
However, there are also valid concerns about the cost and feasibility of investing in public transportation infrastructure. The construction of such systems requires significant financial investment and long-term planning. Moreover, not all cities have the geographical features or existing transport networks that lend themselves to efficient public transit development. In these cases, alternative solutions, such as carpooling schemes or electric vehicle incentives, may be more appropriate.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments against investing in public transportation, it is evident that governments should prioritize its development to reduce car emissions and promote a sustainable future. By carefully evaluating the specific needs and geographical characteristics of each city, governments can implement public transport systems that not only minimize carbon emissions but also contribute to social cohesion and efficient land use.
Score (according to IELTS scoring standards):
- Task Response:
9 - The response fully addresses all parts of the question, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
- Coherence and Cohesion:
8.5 - The essay is well-organized and logically structured, with smooth transitions between paragraphs.
- Lexical Resource:
8.5 - The vocabulary used is varied and sophisticated, with some less common words and phrases.
- Grammar:
8 - The grammar is generally accurate and complex, but there are a few minor errors that do not affect comprehension.
- Presentation of ideas:
9 - The essay presents clear and well-supported arguments, with relevant examples and explanations.
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1712408546&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
