IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should cultural landmarks be protected from development?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1712401970
Topic: "Should cultural landmarks be protected from development?"
Model Answer:
Cultural landmarks are significant historical and architectural sites that hold immense value for a nation or community. The question of whether these landmarks should be protected from development is a subject of debate among urban planners, conservationists, and developers. While some argue that the preservation of these sites is essential to maintain cultural identity and heritage, others contend that it may hinder economic growth and progress.
In favor of protecting cultural landmarks, one can argue that they serve as crucial symbols of a nation's or community's past, reflecting their history, traditions, and identity. The preservation of such sites ensures that future generations are able to learn from the past and understand their roots. For instance, the Eiffel Tower in Paris is not only an architectural marvel but also a symbol of France's industrial prowess during the late 19th century. Destroying or altering these landmarks could lead to a loss of cultural heritage that cannot be compensated for through financial means.
Moreover, cultural landmarks often contribute significantly to tourism, which in turn benefits the local economy. For example, the Great Wall of China attracts millions of tourists every year, generating substantial revenue for the nation. Preserving such sites can create job opportunities in the tourism sector and stimulate economic growth indirectly.
On the other hand, those opposing the protection of cultural landmarks from development argue that it may hinder economic progress and urban planning. Rapid urbanization and the need to accommodate growing populations necessitate the use of available land, including spaces with historical significance. For example, the demolition of the Central Post Office building in Ho Chi Minh City to make way for a modern complex was justified by the city's need for commercial development.
Furthermore, some argue that the resources allocated to preserve cultural landmarks could be better spent on improving infrastructure, healthcare, and education. For instance, investing in renewable energy projects or expanding public transportation systems would provide more immediate benefits to a nation's citizens than preserving historical sites.
In conclusion, whether cultural landmarks should be protected from development is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. While the protection of these sites ensures the preservation of a nation's cultural identity and heritage, it may also obstruct economic progress and urban planning. Striking a balance between conservation and development is essential to maintain cultural continuity while allowing for economic growth and urban renewal.
Task 2 Writing:
Band Score - Overall:
9.0; Achievement:
8.0; Consistency:
8.5; Coherence:
9.0; Lexical Resource:
9.0; Grammatical Range & Accuracy:
9.0
Reasoning behind the scores:
- Task Response: The model answer addresses all aspects of the question and provides a well-balanced perspective on the topic. The response is comprehensive, coherent, and engaging (
8.5).
- Coherence and Cohesion: The paragraphs are logically structured with smooth transitions between ideas, making it easy for readers to follow the argument. The language flow and coherence are excellent (
9.0).
- Lexical Resource: The answer demonstrates a wide range of vocabulary, including idiomatic expressions and sophisticated collocations. The lexical choice is highly appropriate and varied (
9.0).
- Grammar: The grammar is mostly accurate, with only a few minor errors. The use of complex sentence structures and grammatical range reflects advanced language skills (
9.0).
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1712401970&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
