IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should cultural heritage sites be open to tourists?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711273585
IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Should cultural heritage sites be open to tourists?
Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been an ongoing debate regarding whether or not cultural heritage sites should be accessible to tourists. Some people argue that opening these sites to the public allows for greater appreciation and understanding of different cultures. On the other hand, critics claim that mass tourism can lead to irreversible damage to historical artifacts and structures. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and conclude whether or not cultural heritage sites should be open to tourists.
Supporters of allowing tourists into cultural heritage sites argue that these locations provide invaluable educational opportunities for people from different walks of life. By visiting such sites, individuals can gain a deeper understanding of the history, art, and culture of various civilizations. Furthermore, tourism can bring economic benefits to local communities, as visitors spend money on accommodation, food, and other amenities. This income can be used to maintain and preserve cultural heritage sites, ensuring their longevity for future generations.
On the contrary, opponents of mass tourism at cultural heritage sites assert that it can have numerous negative consequences. The influx of tourists can lead to overcrowding, causing strain on infrastructure and resources. Additionally, the constant foot traffic and pollution from noise, littering, and air pollution can result in irreversible damage to artifacts and structures. In some cases, the preservation and conservation efforts may be inadequate due to budget constraints or lack of expertise, which exacerbates the potential harm.
In conclusion, while it is essential to recognize the educational benefits and economic advantages that allowing tourists into cultural heritage sites can provide, it is equally important to consider the potential risks associated with mass tourism. To strike a balance between preserving these invaluable locations and making them accessible to the public, stringent regulations should be implemented. These measures might include limiting visitor numbers, enforcing strict rules regarding behavior, and investing in proper conservation methods. In this way, cultural heritage sites can continue to serve as educational and economic assets while ensuring their long-term preservation.
Scoring:
Task Response:
9 - The model answer addresses both sides of the debate and presents a balanced view. It also provides a recommendation on how to address the issue.
Coherence and Cohesion:
9 - The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The argument flows logically from one point to another.
Lexical Resource:
8 - The model answer employs a wide range of vocabulary, including synonyms and more advanced language. However, it could use slightly more complex sentence structures to further enhance its lexical resource score.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy:
9 - The essay is mostly free of grammar errors, with only a few minor mistakes that do not affect the overall understanding of the text.
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1711273585&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
