IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - In some countries, personal finance is taught in schools as a part of the curriculum. Others argue that this should not be mandatory. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1711089747
Task 2: WritingIn some countries, personal finance is taught in schools as a part of the curriculum. Others argue that this should not be mandatory. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.
Model Answer:
In today's world, financial literacy has become increasingly important, with many people finding themselves overwhelmed by debt and financial instability. As a result, there is an ongoing debate about whether personal finance should be taught in schools as part of the curriculum. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument: those in favor of including personal finance education in schools and those who believe it is not necessary. Ultimately, I will argue that personal finance should indeed be a mandatory part of every student's education.
On one hand, proponents of teaching personal finance in schools argue that it provides students with essential life skills they need to navigate the complex world of finance. By learning about budgeting, saving, investing, and managing debt, students can make informed decisions about their financial futures. Moreover, early exposure to these concepts can help students develop good financial habits from a young age, which are crucial in preventing financial problems later in life.
On the other hand, opponents of mandatory personal finance education argue that it is not the responsibility of schools to teach such skills and should instead be left to parents or external sources like financial institutions. They believe that resources spent on teaching personal finance could be better allocated to core subjects like math, science, and literature. Furthermore, critics argue that students who are interested in learning about personal finance can seek out information through various resources, such as books, online courses, or seminars.
While I understand the arguments against mandatory personal finance education, I believe that it is essential for schools to include this subject in their curriculum. The reality is that many young people enter adulthood without a solid understanding of financial management, which can lead to severe consequences like bankruptcy, poverty, and stress. By incorporating personal finance into the school curriculum, educators have the opportunity to reach all students, regardless of their socioeconomic backgrounds or family circumstances. This ensures that every individual has access to crucial information about money management, which is an invaluable skill for life.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments against mandatory personal finance education in schools, the potential benefits far outweigh the drawbacks. By teaching students about budgeting, saving, investing, and managing debt, we empower them with the knowledge they need to make informed financial decisions throughout their lives. Ultimately, this not only leads to a more financially stable society but also contributes to an overall improvement in the quality of life for individuals from all walks of life.
Score:
Band 9 - This model answer demonstrates a clear understanding of both sides of the argument and presents a well-structured and logical essay that effectively argues in favor of including personal finance education in schools. The essay is coherent, well-organized, and uses appropriate vocabulary and grammar throughout.
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1711089747&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
