IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments provide universal basic income?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710853338
Topic: "Should governments provide universal basic income?"
Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been a growing debate regarding whether governments should implement a universal basic income (UBI). Proponents of UBI argue that it can alleviate poverty and reduce economic inequality. Critics, on the other hand, contend that it may discourage people from seeking employment and lead to higher government spending. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and provide my own perspective on whether governments should provide universal basic income.
Firstly, proponents of UBI argue that it can effectively alleviate poverty. In a world where automation and artificial intelligence are rapidly replacing traditional jobs, many people struggle to find stable employment. A UBI would guarantee a minimum level of financial security for all citizens, regardless of their employment status. This would not only reduce the number of people living in poverty but also provide a safety net for those who are most vulnerable in times of economic downturn.
Moreover, proponents suggest that a UBI can help to reduce economic inequality. Currently, the wealth gap between the richest and poorest members of society is growing at an alarming rate. A universal basic income would redistribute wealth more equitably by providing financial support to those who need it most. This could potentially lead to a fairer and more balanced society.
On the other hand, critics argue that implementing a UBI may discourage people from seeking employment. They contend that if individuals receive money without any conditions or obligations, they may become less motivated to find work. As a result, this could lead to an increase in unemployment rates, which would ultimately exacerbate economic inequality rather than alleviate it.
Furthermore, critics argue that providing a UBI would be financially unfeasible for governments. The cost of implementing such a program would likely be immense, particularly in countries with large populations. Governments would need to raise taxes or cut back on other social programs to fund the UBI, which may have detrimental consequences for other areas of public policy.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments for and against the implementation of universal basic income, I believe that it is a necessary step towards reducing poverty and economic inequality. Governments should consider the long-term benefits of UBI in terms of financial security, social cohesion, and overall quality of life. However, they must also weigh these benefits against the potential costs and unintended consequences, such as decreased motivation to work or increased government spending. Ultimately, the decision whether or not to implement a UBI should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account each country's unique socioeconomic context and needs.
Overall score for this writing:
Band 8.
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1710853338&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
