IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Some people believe that governments should invest in public transportation to reduce car emissions. Others, however, argue that this would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710841100

IELTS Writing Task 2 topic:"Some people believe that governments should invest in public transportation to reduce car emissions. Others, however, argue that this would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion."

Model Answer:

In recent years, the issue of environmental pollution has become an increasingly pressing concern, particularly with regard to air quality and the harmful effects of carbon emissions on human health and the environment. While it is clear that something must be done to address this problem, there are two main approaches to solving it: investing in public transportation or focusing on other alternatives such as renewable energy sources and sustainable practices. This essay will discuss both these views before providing a personal opinion on the matter.

On one hand, many argue that governments should invest heavily in improving and expanding public transportation networks as a means of reducing car emissions. They contend that by making public transport more accessible and convenient, individuals would be encouraged to use it instead of relying on their cars for daily commuting needs. This could have the added benefit of reducing traffic congestion, which itself leads to increased pollution levels due to idling engines and exhaust fumes from stationary vehicles.

In addition, proponents of this viewpoint assert that investing in cleaner forms of public transport, such as electric buses or trains powered by renewable energy sources, would significantly decrease overall carbon emissions. They also argue that these investments would create jobs in the green sector and contribute to economic growth.

Conversely, opponents of such investments believe that focusing on alternative solutions like promoting carpooling schemes, improving fuel efficiency standards for vehicles, or investing in renewable energy projects would be more effective at reducing carbon emissions. They argue that relying solely on public transport is not a long-term solution as it may lead to monopolistic tendencies among transport companies and limit competition within the market. Furthermore, they suggest that governments should instead prioritize funding for research into cleaner technologies or carbon capture methods rather than spending money on expanding existing infrastructure.

In conclusion, while both sides present valid points when discussing whether or not governments should invest in public transportation to reduce car emissions, it is important to recognize the multifaceted nature of this issue. A comprehensive approach that includes a combination of strategies – such as improving public transport systems, promoting sustainable practices among individuals and businesses, investing in renewable energy projects, and implementing stringent regulations on industrial pollution – will likely prove most effective at tackling this environmental challenge.

Overall score: Band 9

This response demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic and presents both sides of the argument effectively. It provides relevant examples and explanations to support each viewpoint, ultimately offering a well-reasoned personal opinion that acknowledges the complexity of the issue.

Source: https://ielts.work/?id=1710841100&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice