IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should cultural institutions repatriate stolen artifacts?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710723995
IELTS Writing Task 2 Topic: Should cultural institutions repatriate stolen artifacts?
Model Answer:
In recent years, the issue of repatriating stolen artifacts has become a subject of intense debate among historians, museum curators, and cultural representatives. Some argue that cultural institutions should return these priceless pieces to their countries of origin, while others maintain that they should remain in the institutions where they have been preserved and studied. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and provide a conclusion based on the merits of each perspective.
On one hand, repatriating stolen artifacts is essential for the cultural heritage of nations from which these artifacts were taken. Many artifacts hold significant historical, religious, or emotional value to the people of the countries they originated from. Returning these objects would help restore a sense of national pride and identity, particularly in developing nations that have been victimized by colonialism. Moreover, it is ethically correct for cultural institutions to return stolen goods, as they were taken unlawfully under dubious circumstances. By repatriating these artifacts, institutions demonstrate their commitment to upholding the principles of justice and fairness.
On the other hand, keeping stolen artifacts in cultural institutions can be justified by several factors. Firstly, many of these objects have been well-preserved and studied in the museums or galleries where they are currently housed. Removing them from these environments could expose them to potential damage or loss. Additionally, some argue that these institutions provide a more accessible platform for people worldwide to appreciate and learn about the artifacts' historical and cultural significance. This global exposure can promote understanding and respect among different cultures, which is an essential aspect of today's interconnected world.
In conclusion, while repatriating stolen artifacts holds ethical merit and serves as a step towards restoring national pride in the countries of origin, it may also have unintended consequences on the preservation and accessibility of these artifacts. It is crucial for cultural institutions to weigh the pros and cons of each scenario and strive to find an appropriate solution that respects both the historical value and ethical implications surrounding stolen artifacts. Ultimately, a balanced approach that considers the needs of all stakeholders involved, including the original countries and the international community, should be adopted to ensure that cultural institutions can contribute effectively to global understanding and appreciation of human history.
IELTS
Score Breakdown:
- Task Response:
9 (The candidate has provided an adequately detailed response to all parts of the question, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic.)
- Coherence and Cohesion:
8.5 (The candidate's essay is logically organized, with smooth transitions between paragraphs, but some minor errors in coherence or cohesion may be observed.)
- Lexical Resource:
8 (The candidate demonstrates an extensive vocabulary range and precise word choices. However, some words might not be entirely accurate or varied enough, affecting the essay's overall lexical resource.)
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
9 (The candidate's grammar is mostly accurate with only a few minor errors that do not hinder the essay's overall clarity and fluency.)
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1710723995&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
