IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Question Some people think that governments should provide subsidies electric vehicles to encourage their use and reduce pollution. Others believe that market ces should determine the popularity of electric vehicles without government intervention. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710691643
Question: Some people think that governments should provide subsidies for electric vehicles to encourage their use and reduce pollution. Others believe that market forces should determine the popularity of electric vehicles without government intervention. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion.
Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been an increasing debate regarding whether governments should provide subsidies for electric vehicles (EVs) to encourage their use and reduce pollution. While some argue that such financial support is necessary to stimulate the adoption of EVs and combat climate change, others maintain that market forces should be left unencumbered to determine the popularity of these environmentally friendly vehicles. This essay will examine both sides of this argument before presenting a personal stance on the matter.
On one hand, proponents of government subsidies for electric vehicles assert that financial incentives are essential in promoting their widespread adoption. They argue that the upfront costs of EVs are generally higher than those of conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, which discourages consumers from making the switch. Furthermore, supporters emphasize that by reducing the initial cost burden, governments can accelerate the transition to a more sustainable transportation sector. Additionally, they highlight the environmental benefits of increasing EV usage, as these vehicles produce zero tailpipe emissions and reduce air pollution, contributing significantly to mitigating climate change.
Conversely, opponents of government intervention argue that market forces should dictate the popularity of electric vehicles without financial support from the state. They contend that if an EV is genuinely superior in terms of efficiency, performance, and environmental impact, then it will naturally gain traction in the marketplace. Critics of subsidies also raise concerns about potential misuse of taxpayer money and question whether such financial support would primarily benefit wealthy consumers who can already afford to purchase EVs.
While both perspectives have merit, it is essential to recognize that a balance between government intervention and market forces is necessary to promote the adoption of electric vehicles effectively. Governments should consider implementing policies that not only provide financial incentives but also invest in charging infrastructure, research and development, and public education campaigns. By doing so, they can ensure that EVs become a more viable and attractive option for consumers while allowing market dynamics to determine their long-term success.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding government subsidies for electric vehicles is multifaceted and requires careful consideration of various factors. While financial incentives may initially boost the popularity of these environmentally friendly vehicles, it is crucial that governments also address other aspects such as charging infrastructure, research, and public awareness to create a conducive ecosystem for EV adoption. Ultimately, finding a balance between government intervention and market forces will be key in determining the future success of electric vehicles and their role in mitigating climate change.
Score (according to IELTS scoring standards):
- Task Response:
9
- Coherence and Cohesion:
8.5
- Lexical Resource:
8
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
8.5
- Overall
Band Score:
8.5
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1710691643&page=ielts-writing-practice
For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
