IELTS.WORK

IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Some people argue that cultural institutions, such as museums, art galleries, and theatres, should be free to the public in order to promote equal access to culture everyone. Others believe that charging an entrance fee can help maintain these institutions and ensure their longterm survival. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion on this matter.

IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710685405

Task 2 Writing:Some people argue that cultural institutions, such as museums, art galleries, and theatres, should be free to the public in order to promote equal access to culture for everyone. Others believe that charging an entrance fee can help maintain these institutions and ensure their long-term survival. Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion on this matter.

Model Answer:

In recent years, the debate over whether cultural institutions should be free for the public or not has become a contentious issue. This essay will discuss both arguments in detail and provide a conclusion based on the merits of each side.

On one hand, making cultural institutions free for everyone can lead to more people being exposed to art, history, and culture. The argument in favour of free access is that it promotes social cohesion by bringing people from different walks of life together in one place. For example, schools can bring underprivileged children on field trips to these establishments, allowing them to experience art and culture firsthand. Additionally, tourists visiting a city often expect free entry to its cultural institutions as part of their itinerary, which can contribute significantly to the local economy.

On the other hand, charging an entrance fee can help maintain the quality and longevity of these cultural institutions. Many museums and art galleries rely on ticket sales to fund their operations, including the maintenance of artworks, staff salaries, and education programs. Without this revenue stream, it may become difficult for these establishments to continue operating at a high standard. Moreover, by charging a fee, visitors may be more selective about which institutions they choose to visit, thereby ensuring that those who do pay are genuinely interested in the experience offered.

In conclusion, while making cultural institutions free for all has its merits in terms of promoting social cohesion and providing equal access to art and culture, it is important not to overlook the financial implications of this decision. Striking a balance between ensuring public access and maintaining the quality of these establishments may require a combination of both free and paid entry options, with a focus on providing affordable or discounted rates for those who cannot afford full price. This approach would ensure that everyone has the opportunity to experience the rich culture that cultural institutions have to offer, without compromising their ability to thrive in the long term.

Task 2 Scoring:

- Task Response: 9 (The candidate fully addressed all parts of the question and provided a detailed response.)
- Coherence and Cohesion: 9 (The essay is well organised, with clear connections between ideas and paragraphs.)
- Lexical Resource: 8 (The vocabulary used is largely appropriate and accurate, with a few errors or inaccuracies.)
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8 (There are only minor grammar errors which do not affect the overall understanding of the essay.)
- Overall: 8.75

Source: https://ielts.work/?id=1710685405&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more: https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice