IELTS Free Online Writing Practice - Should governments impose stricter regulations on industrial pollution?
IELTS.WORK Free Online Writing Practice # 1710491475
Topic: "Should governments impose stricter regulations on industrial pollution?"
Model Answer:
In recent years, the issue of industrial pollution has become increasingly prominent. Governments worldwide have been debating whether they should enforce stricter regulations in order to protect the environment and public health. While it can be argued that tighter controls are essential for safeguarding our planet, there are also valid reasons as to why this may not be the ideal course of action.
One of the most compelling arguments in favor of imposing stricter regulations on industrial pollution is the need to preserve the environment and ensure public health. Industrial activities, particularly those that involve the burning of fossil fuels, release significant amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. This leads to climate change, which in turn causes more frequent and severe weather events such as hurricanes, floods, and droughts. In addition, industrial pollution can contribute to air and water pollution, both of which have serious consequences for human health. For example, breathing polluted air has been linked to respiratory illnesses, while contaminated water supplies can lead to the spread of diseases such as cholera and dysentery.
On the other hand, there are those who argue that imposing stricter regulations on industrial pollution may not be the most effective solution. One concern is that these measures could potentially stifle economic growth. Many industries rely heavily on the use of fossil fuels, and implementing stricter environmental standards could result in higher operating costs for businesses. This, in turn, could lead to job losses and reduced consumer choice, as companies struggle to absorb the increased expenses. Moreover, it is important to note that not all nations have the same level of technological advancement or financial resources to implement stringent regulations. For example, developing countries may lack the necessary infrastructure to monitor emissions levels accurately or enforce compliance with new rules.
In conclusion, while there are strong arguments in favor of imposing stricter regulations on industrial pollution – particularly when it comes to preserving the environment and protecting public health – it is also essential to consider the potential economic consequences. A balanced approach that seeks to strike a compromise between environmental protection and economic growth may be more effective in the long run, ensuring that industries continue to contribute positively to society while minimizing their impact on the environment.
Score:
8
The response provided demonstrates a strong understanding of both sides of the argument, clearly presenting the pros and cons of imposing stricter regulations on industrial pollution. It also presents a balanced conclusion that acknowledges the need for compromise between environmental protection and economic growth. The language used throughout is precise and accurate, with appropriate grammar and punctuation, earning it an IELTS score of
8 out of
9.
Source:
https://ielts.work/?id=1710491475&page=ielts-writing-practice

For more:
https://ielts.work/?page=ielts-writing-practice
