IELTS Free Online Speaking Practice
Part 1: Introduction and Warm-up Questions
1. What is your full name? Can you please repeat it slowly?
2. Where are you from?
3. What do you usually do in your free time?
4. Do you enjoy sports or creative activities more, and why?
5. What kind of music do you like to listen to?
6. Have you ever traveled outside your country? If so, where did you go and what did you like about that place?
7. What are some important events in your life so far?
8. What is something that makes you feel happy or proud when you think about it?
9. How would you describe yourself as a person?
10. Do you prefer to live in the city or the countryside, and why?
Part 2: Cue Card - Talk about a goal you achieved
Describe a goal that you have recently accomplished. You should say:
- What the goal was
- How long it took you to achieve this goal
- The challenges you faced along the way
- The steps you took to accomplish the goal
- How it feels to achieve this goal
Part 3: Follow-up Questions (Based on Part 2)
1. Can you tell me more about why that particular goal was important to you?
2. What motivated you to set and pursue this goal?
3. How did your family and friends react when they found out you accomplished this goal?
4. How has achieving this goal affected your life or the way you think about yourself?
5. Can you tell me more about one of the challenges you faced while pursuing this goal, and how you overcame it?
IELTS Free Online Writing Practice
Topic: "Should governments provide universal access to food assistance programs?"
Model Answer:
In recent years, there has been an increasing debate about whether governments should provide universal access to food assistance programs. Some argue that these programs are essential in ensuring that no one goes hungry, while others believe that they encourage dependency and should only be available to those in genuine need. This essay will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of providing universal access to food assistance programs and offer a conclusion based on a balanced evaluation of the evidence.
On the one hand, there are several compelling reasons for governments to provide universal access to food assistance programs. Firstly, such programs can act as a safety net for vulnerable individuals who may be unable to secure regular employment or have other financial difficulties. For example, single parents, people with disabilities, and elderly citizens may struggle to find stable work, making it difficult for them to afford adequate nutrition without government support. By offering universal access to food assistance programs, governments can help these groups avoid hunger and malnutrition, which are significant contributors to health problems and social unrest.
Secondly, providing universal access to food assistance programs can reduce income inequality within a society. This is because the programs can help bridge the gap between those with low incomes and those with high incomes. By ensuring that everyone has access to sufficient nutrition, governments can create a more equitable distribution of resources and promote social cohesion.
On the other hand, there are also arguments against universal access to food assistance programs. One major concern is that providing such support to all citizens could lead to an overreliance on these programs and discourage people from seeking employment or improving their financial situation. This could ultimately result in a decrease in social mobility and an increase in welfare dependency.
Moreover, there are concerns about the potential misuse of food assistance programs by individuals who do not genuinely require support. For example, some people may exploit these programs for personal gain or use them as a source of free food while still being capable of working. In this way, universal access to food assistance programs could be seen as unfairly benefiting certain groups at the expense of those who genuinely need help.
In conclusion, whether or not governments should provide universal access to food assistance programs is a complex issue that requires careful consideration. While there are undoubtedly benefits to providing such support for vulnerable populations and reducing income inequality, it is equally important to ensure that these programs do not inadvertently create dependency or contribute to social unrest. As such, a balanced approach that takes into account both the needs of individuals and the broader implications for society would be the most effective way to address this challenging topic.
Score: Band 9 (Excellent)
IELTS.WORK offers comprehensive practice tests, personalized feedback, and expert guidance to help you succeed in the IELTS exam.
- Comprehensive Practice Tests
- AI-Powered Feedback
- Tailored Study Plans
- Interactive Learning Resources
- Flexible Study Options
- Expert Guidance and Support
- Realistic Exam Simulation